diff options
author | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-15 00:16:26 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-15 00:16:26 -0500 |
commit | b75d9d8f2ba798fbbadc975a789cf2615b743328 (patch) | |
tree | 404c03de1aae4dc9f05194dc2d4e6e36203dafe0 /opa_phase | |
parent | 4c38970579d9bd994b18f10ab9fd3956beff4929 (diff) |
2018-04-15 00:16
Diffstat (limited to 'opa_phase')
-rw-r--r-- | opa_phase/chapter.tex | 64 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | opa_phase/darien_playing.py | 3 |
2 files changed, 42 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/opa_phase/chapter.tex b/opa_phase/chapter.tex index 774ab45..ae1a9ea 100644 --- a/opa_phase/chapter.tex +++ b/opa_phase/chapter.tex @@ -1,35 +1,53 @@ \chapter{Abandon the random phase approximation} \label{cha:rpa} -Recently we've made some measurements that seem to imply phase stability between the fs OPAs. % -We've typically assumed that the OPAs have random phase on every shot, making coherent heterodyne -processes average to zero. % -These measurements show that this is a very bad assumption. % - -I've taken the interferogram of OPA1 vs OPA2, Clearly the OPAs remain phase locked for many shots. % -In 'over time' I show the spectral phase pattern (D = 500 fs) for 1000 single shot acquisitions -over 430 seconds in lab time. % -The phase does drift, but it is certainly not quickly randomized. % +\clearpage + +Historically, we've assumed that OPAs have random phase on every shot. % +This makes interference processes quickly average to zero over many shots---we rarely take fewer +than 100 shots per pixel. % +Here I demonstrate that this assumption is very poor, at least for the femtosecond OPAs. % + +In these experiments, I simply send OPA1 and OPA2 simultaniously into the array detector. % +The crucial detail is that the beams are exactly collinear---overlaped in a beamsplitter. % +I then scan delay between them while collecting single shot spectra using the array detector. % -I have more data showing: -How the spectral phase changes over the course of hours. -How the phase evolves as we scan the OPAs against each-other in color. -The reproducibility of phase as the OPA motors move away and then return to a given color. +\autoref{rpa:fig:delay} shows the results of these experiments for OPA2 vs itself +(``auto-interference'') and vs OPA1 (``cross interference''). % +At zero delay all colors arise simultaniously, so there are no modulations along the array axis +(vertical). % +As I scan further from zero modulations set in as each wavelength within the pulse has a different +period in delay space. % +It is crucial to remember that the monochromator acts like a stretcher, so we see interference +between the two pulses even when separated by 400 fs. % + +The fringe pattern is expected in the case of auto-interference, but it is also quite stable in +cross-interference. In the next experiment, I explore just how stable the cross-phase is. + +\autoref{rpa:fig:time} shows the same single-shot spectrum taken 1000 times at a fixed delay of 500 +fs. % +The phase does drift, but it is certainly not quickly randomized. % +In fact, the period shifts by 180 degrees in roughly one minute---much much longer than any single +pixel that we have taken. % -I'll work this data up and send out another email with many more details and thoughts once I have -time. % -This quick note is just to let the group know that we must abandon the 'random phase' assumption -when thinking about what heterodyne processes can happen as coherent artifacts. % +This result forces us to reconsider our assumptions when identifying potential sources of artifact +in our measurements. % \begin{figure} - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/cross interference"} - \caption[CAPTION TODO]{ - CAPTION TODO + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/auto_cross_interference"} + \caption[Auto-interference vs cross-interference.]{ + Interference between OPA outputs as function of relative arrival time. + In the left hand plot, OPA2 interferes with itself. + In the right hand plot, OPA1 interferes with OPA2. + Signal is intensity level. } + \label{rpa:fig:delay} \end{figure} \begin{figure} - \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/430 seconds"} - \caption[CAPTION TODO]{ - CAPTION TODO + \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/time_interference"} + \caption[Cross interference over 100 seconds.]{ + Cross interference at fixed delay of 500 fs. + 1000 single-shot acquisitions over a period of 100 seconds in lab time. } + \label{rpa:fig:time} \end{figure} diff --git a/opa_phase/darien_playing.py b/opa_phase/darien_playing.py index cc8ce39..b8bd5b7 100644 --- a/opa_phase/darien_playing.py +++ b/opa_phase/darien_playing.py @@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ if True: ax.set_xlabel('lab time (s)') ax.set_ylabel(col.auto.wa.label) ax.grid() - - #d.array.clip(.3) + d.array.clip(.3) fig, gs = wt.artists.create_figure(width='double', cols=[1, 'cbar'], default_aspect=.5) # overtime ax = plt.subplot(gs[0,0]) |