JCW Summary of Changes

3 files changed, 10 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/abstract.tex b/abstract.tex
index dd08aa0..2c9b4ed 100644
--- a/abstract.tex
+++ b/abstract.tex
@@ -5,9 +5,10 @@
 
 Coherent multidimensional spectroscopy (CMDS) encompasses a family of experimental strategies
 involving the nonlinear interaction between electric fields and a material under investigation.  %
-This approach has several unique capabilities: 1. resolving congested states [CITE KLUG], 2.
-extracting spectra that would otherwise be selection-rule disslowed [CITE BOYLE], 3. resolving
-fully coherent dyanmics [CITE], 4. measuring coupling [CITE], and 5. resolving ultrafast dynamics
+This approach has several unique capabilities: 1. resolving congested states [CITE KLUG and % JCW Zhao and Wright-JACS], 
+2. extracting spectra that would otherwise be selection-rule disslowed [CITE BOYLE], 3. resolving
+fully coherent dyanmics [CITE % JCW Pakoulev and Wright], 
+4. measuring coupling [CITE], and 5. resolving ultrafast dynamics
 [CITE].  %
 
 CMDS can be collected in the frequency or the time domain, and each approach has advantages and
diff --git a/introduction/chapter.tex b/introduction/chapter.tex
index be4572d..b8877e6 100644
--- a/introduction/chapter.tex
+++ b/introduction/chapter.tex
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ flexable in the kinds of experiments that they can perform.  %
 This dissertation contains several projects undertaken to improve the reliability and accessibility

 of MR-CMDS.  %

 While MR-CMDS will never be a single-shot experiment, there are many improvements that can improve

-data collection speed.  %

+data collection speed.  % JCW- NOT SO SURE IT CAN'T BE SINGLE SHOT

 Necessary calibration, especially OPA calibration, can be made robust and fully automatic.  %

 Common artifacts can be addressed through relatively simple modifications in hardware and

 software.  %

@@ -64,11 +64,12 @@ frequency-domain coherent multidimensional spectroscopy.  %
 Due to its diversity and dimensionality, MR-CMDS data is challenging to process and represent.  %

 The data processing tools that a scientist develops to process one experiment may not work when she

 attempts to process an experiment where different experimental variables are explored.  %

-Historically, this has meant that MR-CMDS practitioners have used custom, one-off data processing

+Historically, this % JCW- "THIS" SHOULDN'T BE A NOUN STANDING ALONE AS THE SUBJECT OF THE SENTENCE

+has meant that MR-CMDS practitioners have used custom, one-off data processing

 workflows that need to be changed for each particular experiment.  %

 These changes take time to implement, and can become stumbling blocks or opportunities for

 error.  %

-Even worse, the challenge of designing a new processing workflow may make dissuade scientist from

+Even worse, the challenge of designing a new processing workflow may dissuade A scientist from

 creatively modifying their experimental strategy, or comparing their data with data taken from

 another group.  %

 This limit to creativity and flexibility defeats one of the main advantages of the MR-CMDS

diff --git a/spectroscopy/chapter.tex b/spectroscopy/chapter.tex
index 3bde7b4..030edd5 100644
--- a/spectroscopy/chapter.tex
+++ b/spectroscopy/chapter.tex
@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ For simplicity, we consider a single transition dipole, $\mu$.  %
 

 The Hamiltonian which controls the coupling of or simple system to the electric field described in

 ...:

+% jcw- ISN'T IT JUST MU DOT E WHERE E IS A VECTOR THAT IS TIME DEPENDENT, NOT A TIME DERIVATIVE 

 \begin{equation}

   H = H_{\circ} - \mu \dot E

 \end{equation}

@@ -90,7 +91,7 @@ In Dirac notation \cite{DiracPaulAdrienMaurice1939a}., an observable (such as $\
 \end{equation}

 The complex wavefunction is called a \emph{ket}, represented $|b>$.  %

 The complex conjugate is called a \emph{bra}, represented $<a|$.  %

-When expanded,

+When expanded,  % JCW- MU IS NOT THE OPERATOR. THE OPERATOR IS THE TIME DEPENDENT HAMILTONIAN. MU MULIPLIES ca and cb

 \begin{equation}

   \mu(t) = c_a^2\mu_a + c_b^2\mu_b + \left< c_aa \left| \hat{mu} \right| c_bb \right> +

   \left<c_bb \left| \hat{mu} \right| c_aa \right>