diff options
author | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-14 13:38:51 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-14 13:38:51 -0500 |
commit | c9e80239518db5667d340054adb21e599b62494a (patch) | |
tree | 54ef05db15c3df2bab6662694d0c761023f36259 /opa | |
parent | 00fb8d01e53be66fe4dfde3beee3c98acc18f3b7 (diff) |
2018-04-14 13:38
Diffstat (limited to 'opa')
-rw-r--r-- | opa/TOPAS-C.png | bin | 0 -> 384548 bytes | |||
-rw-r--r-- | opa/chapter.tex | 70 |
2 files changed, 63 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/opa/TOPAS-C.png b/opa/TOPAS-C.png Binary files differnew file mode 100644 index 0000000..da31d22 --- /dev/null +++ b/opa/TOPAS-C.png diff --git a/opa/chapter.tex b/opa/chapter.tex index 89d4d5d..3d163e2 100644 --- a/opa/chapter.tex +++ b/opa/chapter.tex @@ -26,10 +26,10 @@ OPA tuning range into the visible, near-infrared, and mid-infrared. % OPAs are very sensitive to changes in upstream lasers and lab conditions, so OPA tuning is
regularly required. %
Manual OPA tuning can easily take a full day. %
-Furthermore, manual tuning typically results in inferior tuning curves, since it is difficult to
-consider all available information simultaneously. %
-Automated OPA tuning makes OPA upkeep easier, faster and more reproducible, facilitating frequency
-domain experiments. %
+Furthermore, manual tuning typically results in inferior tuning curves, since it is difficult for
+humans to consider all available information simultaneously. %
+Automated OPA tuning makes OPA upkeep easier, faster and more reproducible, facilitating higher
+throughput, higher quality frequency domain experiments. %
The major challenges in automated OPA tuning are:
\begin{enumerate}
\item Expensive to take high resoltion data.
@@ -42,10 +42,57 @@ curves. % While I have strategies for all four kinds of OPAs used in the Wright Group, I focus on the
femtosecond TOPAS-C models because they are by far the most challenging model to calibrate. %
-\clearpage
+\section{Curves} \label{opa:sec:curves} % ========================================================
+
+OPA tuning curves are the functional correspondence between desired output color and motor
+positions. %
+In theory, these could be recorded as analytical functions derived in an \textit{ab initio} way
+from known phase matching and dispersion relations. %
+In practice, ideal tuning curves are determined empirically by simply monitoring OPA output at a
+series of given motor combinations. %
+This practice of seeing how OPA output depends on motor positions is called ``tuning'' the OPA. %
+
+I have defined a Python class \python{Curve} which acts as a interface to OPA tuning curves. %
+Within the class, a series of discrete OPA output colors (``setpoints'') are defined, and the motor
+positions are defined for each setpoint. %
+Since it is important that OPAs be settable to \emph{any} position within their output range, a
+one-dimensional interpolator is used to determine the correct motor positions for \emph{any} valid
+color. %
+There are three kinds of interpolators, linear, spline and polynomial. %
+The particular interpolator used depends on the model of OPA and the complexity of its tuning
+curve. %
+The method \python{Curve.get_motor_positions} abstracts away this complexity, simply returning a
+list of motor positions for the desired color(s). %
+
+OPAs often use multiple ``stages'' of interaction to create the desired output. %
+For example, an OPA might generate signal and idler in a first stage, then send that signal on to
+be doubled in a second ``second harmonic signal'' (SHS) stage. %
+Depending on the experiment being performed, different stages of the OPA will be used. %
+One could approach this complexity by simply creating an entirely separate curve for each
+combination of stages, but this would result in the same information being duplicated in many
+different curves. %
+Instead, I have chosen to use a nested approach that directly reflects the approach that the
+hardware uses. %
+Curve objects can have ``subcurves'' which define the behavior of the proceeding stage. %
+In the example above, the parent curve would control the second harmonic signal stage. %
+For each SHS position, the parent would define a desired signal color for the first stage to
+create. %
+This is passed to the subcurve, which defines the motor positions needed in the first stage to
+achieve optimal conversion at the desired \emph{signal} color. %
+In this way, each stage can be tuned separately and the tuning of an upstream stage is immediately
+propagated to all downstream stages. %
+
+% BJT: consider putting an example curve figure
+
\section{TOPAS-C} % ==============================================================================
-[INTRODUCTION TO THE TOPAS-C]
+The TOPAS-C is a popular commercially available motorized OPA. %
+It consists of a large initial stage where signal and idler are generated, and a series of optional
+mixing stages where further up- or down-conversion can occur to widen the total range of output
+frequencies. %
+\autoref{opa:fig:ranges} shows all of the possible output ranges of the TOPAS. %
+It ranges from the mid infrared (accessible through difference frequency generation) to the
+ultraviolet (accessible through multiple second harmonic upconversion). %
% TODO: introduction to the internal design of the OPA
@@ -54,7 +101,16 @@ femtosecond TOPAS-C models because they are by far the most challenging model to \caption{
CAPTION TODO
}
- \label{opa:fig:preamp}
+ \label{opa:fig:ranges}
+\end{figure}
+
+\begin{figure}
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{opa/TOPAS-C}
+ \caption[TOPAS-C internal optics and beam path.]{
+ TOPAS-C internal optics and beam path. %
+ Image taken from manual, originally generated by Light Conversion [CITE]. %
+ }
+ \label{opa:fig:TOPAS-C}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
|