1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/active_correction/chapter.tex b/active_correction/chapter.tex
index 6d429a0..fbbc26c 100644
--- a/active_correction/chapter.tex
+++ b/active_correction/chapter.tex
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ parameterization of delay space chosen.  %
 First I focus on the interference patterns in 2D delay space where all excitation fields and the

 detection field are at the same frequency.  %

 

-\begin{dfigure}

+\begin{figure}

 	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"active_correction/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE old"}

 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in old delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated

     interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the old delay parametrization. Each column

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ detection field are at the same frequency.  %
     bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show the

     cross peaks.}

   label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold}

-\end{dfigure}

+\end{figure}

 

 Here I derive the slopes of constant phase for the old delay space, where

 $\mathrm{d1}=\tau_{2^\prime1}$ and $\mathrm{d2}=\tau_{21}$.  %

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ The cross term between scatter and signal is the product of $\Phi_\mathrm{sig}$
 Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of scatter interference as a visual aid. See Yurs 2011 \cite{YursLenaA2011a}.

 % TODO: Yurs 2011 Data

 

-\begin{dfigure}

+\begin{figure}

 	\includegraphics[width=7in]{"active_correction/scatter/scatter interference in TrEE current"}

 	\caption[Simulated interference paterns in current delay parameterization.]{Numerically simulated

     interference patterns between scatter and TrEE for the current delay parametrization. Each

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Figure \ref{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEold} presents numerical simulations of
     the bottom row shows the 2D Fourier transform, with the colorbar's dynamic range chosen to show

     the cross peaks.}

   \label{fig:scatterinterferenceinTrEEcurrent}

-\end{dfigure}

+\end{figure}

 

 Here I derive the slopes of constant phase for the current delay space, where $\mathrm{d1}=\tau_{22^\prime}$ and $\mathrm{d2}=\tau_{21}$. I take $\tau_2$ to be $0$, so that $\tau_{22^\prime}\rightarrow\tau_{2^\prime}$ and $\tau_{21}\rightarrow\tau_1$. The phase of the signal is then

 \begin{equation}

@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ this technique was used prior to May 2016 in the Wright Group...  %
 `leveling' and single-chopping is also used in some early 2DES work...

 \cite{BrixnerTobias2004a}.  %

 

-\begin{dfigure} 

+\begin{figure} 

 	\includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"active_correction/scatter/TA chopping comparison"}

 	\caption[Comparison of single, dual chopping.]{Comparison of single and dual chopping in a

     MoS\textsubscript{2} transient absorption experiment. Note that this data has not been

@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ this technique was used prior to May 2016 in the Wright Group...  %
     grey line near 2 eV represents the pump energy. The inset labels are the number of laser shots

     taken and the chopping strategy used.}

   \label{fig:ta-chopping-comparison}

-\end{dfigure}

+\end{figure}

 

 Figure \ref{fig:ta-chopping-comparison} shows the effects of dual chopping for some representative

 MoS\textsubscript{2} TA data.  %