aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/software
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBlaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>2018-04-09 00:24:18 -0500
committerBlaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>2018-04-09 00:24:18 -0500
commit357568e1fb77afed9dfa203e62da237bf7ce51b3 (patch)
tree57b8ddafd412934f1e72b7e1f7fe0256480938fd /software
parente43de3cb79a9fad846babf0ddfdca21622b903dc (diff)
2018-04-09 00:24
Diffstat (limited to 'software')
-rw-r--r--software/chapter.tex11
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/software/chapter.tex b/software/chapter.tex
index 14693ee..e6707dd 100644
--- a/software/chapter.tex
+++ b/software/chapter.tex
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+%A whole set of licenses have been written to use for this purpose. %
+%Briefly, strong copyleft licenses do not allow for software to be modified or enhancements without
+%sharing those enhancements under the same licenses. %
+%These ``viral'' licenses are meant to force companies and individuals who would otherwise not open
+%source to share their code. %
+%The strongest copyleft licenses do not even allow others to link against the licensed software
+%without themselves being copyleft. %
+%This strategy has been moderately successful, but is becoming less popular. % TODO: cite
+%Open source licenses are less opinionated, merely granting users the right to copy, modify,
+%distribute, and publish code without restriction except perhaps credit to the source. %
+
\chapter{Software} \label{cha:sof}
\begin{dquote}