aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/opa_phase
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBlaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>2018-04-15 00:16:26 -0500
committerBlaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>2018-04-15 00:16:26 -0500
commitb75d9d8f2ba798fbbadc975a789cf2615b743328 (patch)
tree404c03de1aae4dc9f05194dc2d4e6e36203dafe0 /opa_phase
parent4c38970579d9bd994b18f10ab9fd3956beff4929 (diff)
2018-04-15 00:16
Diffstat (limited to 'opa_phase')
-rw-r--r--opa_phase/chapter.tex64
-rw-r--r--opa_phase/darien_playing.py3
2 files changed, 42 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/opa_phase/chapter.tex b/opa_phase/chapter.tex
index 774ab45..ae1a9ea 100644
--- a/opa_phase/chapter.tex
+++ b/opa_phase/chapter.tex
@@ -1,35 +1,53 @@
\chapter{Abandon the random phase approximation} \label{cha:rpa}
-Recently we've made some measurements that seem to imply phase stability between the fs OPAs. %
-We've typically assumed that the OPAs have random phase on every shot, making coherent heterodyne
-processes average to zero. %
-These measurements show that this is a very bad assumption. %
-
-I've taken the interferogram of OPA1 vs OPA2, Clearly the OPAs remain phase locked for many shots. %
-In 'over time' I show the spectral phase pattern (D = 500 fs) for 1000 single shot acquisitions
-over 430 seconds in lab time. %
-The phase does drift, but it is certainly not quickly randomized. %
+\clearpage
+
+Historically, we've assumed that OPAs have random phase on every shot. %
+This makes interference processes quickly average to zero over many shots---we rarely take fewer
+than 100 shots per pixel. %
+Here I demonstrate that this assumption is very poor, at least for the femtosecond OPAs. %
+
+In these experiments, I simply send OPA1 and OPA2 simultaniously into the array detector. %
+The crucial detail is that the beams are exactly collinear---overlaped in a beamsplitter. %
+I then scan delay between them while collecting single shot spectra using the array detector. %
-I have more data showing:
-How the spectral phase changes over the course of hours.
-How the phase evolves as we scan the OPAs against each-other in color.
-The reproducibility of phase as the OPA motors move away and then return to a given color.
+\autoref{rpa:fig:delay} shows the results of these experiments for OPA2 vs itself
+(``auto-interference'') and vs OPA1 (``cross interference''). %
+At zero delay all colors arise simultaniously, so there are no modulations along the array axis
+(vertical). %
+As I scan further from zero modulations set in as each wavelength within the pulse has a different
+period in delay space. %
+It is crucial to remember that the monochromator acts like a stretcher, so we see interference
+between the two pulses even when separated by 400 fs. %
+
+The fringe pattern is expected in the case of auto-interference, but it is also quite stable in
+cross-interference. In the next experiment, I explore just how stable the cross-phase is.
+
+\autoref{rpa:fig:time} shows the same single-shot spectrum taken 1000 times at a fixed delay of 500
+fs. %
+The phase does drift, but it is certainly not quickly randomized. %
+In fact, the period shifts by 180 degrees in roughly one minute---much much longer than any single
+pixel that we have taken. %
-I'll work this data up and send out another email with many more details and thoughts once I have
-time. %
-This quick note is just to let the group know that we must abandon the 'random phase' assumption
-when thinking about what heterodyne processes can happen as coherent artifacts. %
+This result forces us to reconsider our assumptions when identifying potential sources of artifact
+in our measurements. %
\begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/cross interference"}
- \caption[CAPTION TODO]{
- CAPTION TODO
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/auto_cross_interference"}
+ \caption[Auto-interference vs cross-interference.]{
+ Interference between OPA outputs as function of relative arrival time.
+ In the left hand plot, OPA2 interferes with itself.
+ In the right hand plot, OPA1 interferes with OPA2.
+ Signal is intensity level.
}
+ \label{rpa:fig:delay}
\end{figure}
\begin{figure}
- \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/430 seconds"}
- \caption[CAPTION TODO]{
- CAPTION TODO
+ \includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"opa_phase/time_interference"}
+ \caption[Cross interference over 100 seconds.]{
+ Cross interference at fixed delay of 500 fs.
+ 1000 single-shot acquisitions over a period of 100 seconds in lab time.
}
+ \label{rpa:fig:time}
\end{figure}
diff --git a/opa_phase/darien_playing.py b/opa_phase/darien_playing.py
index cc8ce39..b8bd5b7 100644
--- a/opa_phase/darien_playing.py
+++ b/opa_phase/darien_playing.py
@@ -93,8 +93,7 @@ if True:
ax.set_xlabel('lab time (s)')
ax.set_ylabel(col.auto.wa.label)
ax.grid()
-
- #d.array.clip(.3)
+ d.array.clip(.3)
fig, gs = wt.artists.create_figure(width='double', cols=[1, 'cbar'], default_aspect=.5)
# overtime
ax = plt.subplot(gs[0,0])