diff options
| author | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-15 16:11:28 -0500 | 
|---|---|---|
| committer | Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com> | 2018-04-15 16:11:28 -0500 | 
| commit | 0f87beb9b3cbf8447f4850be0eb9874e9c4fb64f (patch) | |
| tree | f477e262dadba4f5098fb4d0ce727de40d94016d /introduction/chapter.tex | |
| parent | 95ef738c7ce584d0f681b0586024719f674cb764 (diff) | |
2018-04-15 16:11
Diffstat (limited to 'introduction/chapter.tex')
| -rw-r--r-- | introduction/chapter.tex | 30 | 
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/introduction/chapter.tex b/introduction/chapter.tex index f6adc46..b3d9df5 100644 --- a/introduction/chapter.tex +++ b/introduction/chapter.tex @@ -16,10 +16,10 @@  Coherent multidimensional spectroscopy (CMDS) is a family of experimental strategies capable of
  providing unique insights into microscopic material physics.  %
 -It is similar to more familiar multidimensional NMR experiments \cite{ZhaoWei2000b,
 -  PakoulevAndreiV2006a}, although the implementation is different due to differences between the
 -behavior of nuclear spin states (probed by NMR) and electronic and vibrational states (probed by
 -CMDS).  %
 +It is similar to more familiar multidimensional NMR experiments \cite{KeustersDorine1999a,
 +  ZhaoWei2000b, PakoulevAndreiV2006a}, although the implementation is different due to differences
 +between the behavior of nuclear spin states (probed by NMR) and electronic and vibrational states
 +(probed by CMDS).  %
  CMDS can resolve couplings between states, and can decongest spectra by taking advantage of
  dimensionality and selection rules.  %
  With the advent of ultrafast lasers, CMDS can resolve dynamics in excited states and the coupling
 @@ -146,6 +146,16 @@ complementary to chopping.  %  Automated poynting correction and power correction can account for non-idealities in OPA
  performance.  %
 +MR-CMDS instruments rely on OPAs as tunable light sources.  %
 +OPAs are very sensitive to changes in upstream lasers and lab conditions, so OPA tuning is
 +regularly required.  %
 +Manual OPA tuning can easily take a full day of human effort. %
 +Furthermore, manual tuning typically results in inferior tuning curves, since it is difficult for
 +humans to consider all available information simultaneously.  %
 +Automated OPA tuning makes OPA upkeep easier, faster and more reproducible, facilitating higher
 +throughput, higher quality frequency domain experiments. %
 +Chapter \ref{cha:opa} describes fully automated tuning algorithms which I have developed.  %
 +
  The theory that is used to describe CMDS is typically derived in one of two limits.  %
  In the impulsive limit, pulses are broad in frequency and short in time compared to material
  resonances.  %
 @@ -183,8 +193,8 @@ They are easy to synthesize, store and prepare in the solution phase, and they h  relatively narrow band-edge excitons which are easy to interrogate using MR-CMDS.  %
  In \autoref{cha:pss}, we describe a simple approach to extracting the quantitative third-order
  susceptibility of PbSe quantum dots using MR-CMDS.  %
 -Using a simple approach of standard dilutions, we define this susceptibility in ratio to the known
 -well-quantified susceptibility of our solvent and cuvette windows.  %
 +Using standard dilutions, we define this susceptibility in ratio to the known well-quantified
 +susceptibility of our solvent and cuvette windows.  %
  A few-parameter model is employed to extract this ratio.  %
  We are optimistic that this approach will be generally applicable, making it simple to perform
  quantitative solution-phase MR-CMDS.  %
 @@ -213,23 +223,23 @@ frequency-frequency-delay transient grating spectroscopy to understand the basic  dynamics of MoS\textsubscript{2}.  %
  We show that the band-edge excitons of MoS\textsubscript{2} are not easily resolved, and the
  dynamics of MoS\textsubscript{2} are fast.  %
 -We develop a picture of MoS\textsubscript{2} electronic states that is consistent with our
 +We describe a picture of MoS\textsubscript{2} electronic states that is consistent with our
  results.  %
  In \autoref{cha:pps} we use MR-CMDS to interrogate the dynamics of electronic states of
 -(PEDOT:PSS).  %
 +PEDOT:PSS.  %
  PEDOT:PSS is a transparent, electrically conductive polymer.  %
  The exact origin of the conductivity is not well understood, so it is unclear how to improve the
  conductivity or synthesize other conductive polymers.  %
  We performed photon echo experiments on PEDOT:PSS, directly interrogating the electronic states
 -that are responsible for conductivity in the polymer.  %
 +that are speculated to participate in conductivity.  %
  Using a sophisticated model extended from the work in \autoref{cha:mix}, we constrain the pure and
  ensemble dephasing lifetimes of PEDOT:PSS.  %
  These lifetimes can be directly related to the homogeneous and inhomogeneous broadening parameters
  in PEDOT:PSS.  %
  Amazingly, we find that PEDOT:PSS has very broad homogeneous \emph{and} inhomogeneous
  linewidths.  %
 -We cannot constrain either quantity, but we can put lower limits on both.  %
 +We cannot fully determine either quantity, but we can put lower limits on both.  %
  This basic information is complementary to other experiments in the ongoing effort to fully
  understand PEDOT:PSS.  %
  | 
