From 798bd484137439bf1d0752ddde82bf49da4af6b7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:32:20 -0500
Subject: 2018-04-16 13:32

---
 quantitative_ta/chapter.tex | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'quantitative_ta/chapter.tex')

diff --git a/quantitative_ta/chapter.tex b/quantitative_ta/chapter.tex
index 099b606..cecf2b9 100644
--- a/quantitative_ta/chapter.tex
+++ b/quantitative_ta/chapter.tex
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ calibration sample.  %
 Given the eight experimental measurables ($V_\mathrm{T}$, $V_\mathrm{R}$, $V_{\Delta\mathrm{T}}$,
 $V_{\Delta\mathrm{R}}$, $V_{\mathrm{T},\,\mathrm{ref}}$, $V_{\mathrm{R},\,\mathrm{ref}}$,
 $\mathcal{T}_\mathrm{ref}$, $\mathcal{R}_\mathrm{ref}$) I can express all of the intensities in
-\autoref{eq:ta_complete} in terms of $I_0$.  %
+\autoref{qta:eqn:ta_complete} in terms of $I_0$.  %
 
 \begin{eqnarray}
 C_\mathrm{T} &=& \frac{\mathcal{T}_\mathrm{ref}}{V_{\mathrm{T},\,\mathrm{ref}}} \\
@@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ I_{\Delta\mathrm{T}} &=& I_0 C_\mathrm{T} V_{\Delta\mathrm{T}} \\
 I_{\Delta\mathrm{R}} &=& I_0 C_\mathrm{R} V_{\Delta\mathrm{R}}
 \end{eqnarray} 
 
-Wonderfully, the $I_0$ cancels when plugged back in to \autoref{eq:ta_complete}, leaving a final
-expression for $\Delta A$ that only depends on my eight measurables.  %
+Wonderfully, the $I_0$ cancels when plugged back into \autoref{qta:eqn:ta_complete}, leaving a
+final expression for $\Delta A$ that only depends on my eight measurables.  %
 
 \begin{equation}
 \Delta A = - \log_{10} \left(\frac{C_\mathrm{T}(V_\mathrm{T} + V_{\Delta\mathrm{T}}) + C_\mathrm{R}(V_\mathrm{R} + V_{\Delta\mathrm{R}})}{C_\mathrm{T} V_\mathrm{T} + C_\mathrm{R} V_\mathrm{R}}\right)
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

