From 20fe6fadfec8ba0db5a22a409f5853ccc1d5ddd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Blaise Thompson <blaise@untzag.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 16:23:24 -0500
Subject: 2018-04-21 16:23

---
 presentation.tex | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

(limited to 'presentation.tex')

diff --git a/presentation.tex b/presentation.tex
index 1729bb2..47ae640 100644
--- a/presentation.tex
+++ b/presentation.tex
@@ -43,6 +43,14 @@
   % SAY: based on the same basic ability to scan pulses in frequency, delay etc
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}{Pipeline}
+  \adjincludegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{presentation/pipe}
+  What does the ``pipeline'' of MR-CMDS data acquisition and processing look like in the Wright
+  Group?
+  \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
+  How to increase data throughput and quality, while decreasing frustration of experimentalists?  %
+\end{frame}
+
 \begin{frame}{MR-CMDS development}
   [SUMMARY SLIDE FOR REMAINDER OF PRESENTATION]
 \end{frame}
@@ -127,9 +135,9 @@
         \item can be scheduled for odd times
         \item high quality from global analysis 
         \item reproducible
-        \item unambiguous representations
+        \item unambiguous representations automatically generated
       \end{itemize}
-      \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
+      \vspace{\baselineskip}
       Other calibration steps also automated.
     \end{column}
   \end{columns}
@@ -151,16 +159,7 @@
     \item filters
     \item OPAs
   \end{itemize}
-  $\sim10$ settable devices, $\sim25$ motors. \\
-  Multiple detectors.
-\end{frame}
-
-\begin{frame}{Pipeline}
-  \adjincludegraphics[width=0.5\textwidth]{presentation/pipe}
-  What does the ``pipeline'' of MR-CMDS data acquisition and processing look like in the Wright
-  Group?
-  \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
-  How to increase data throughput and quality, while decreasing frustration of experimentalists?  %
+  $\sim10$ settable devices, $\sim25$ motors, multiple detectors.
 \end{frame}
 
 \begin{frame}{Acquisition}
@@ -168,26 +167,36 @@
   \adjincludegraphics[width=\textwidth]{acquisition/screenshots/000}
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}{Abstraction}
-  Hardware---something that has a \hl{position} that can be \hl{set}.
-  \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
-  Sensor---something that has a \hl{signal} that can be \hl{read}.
-\end{frame}
-
 \begin{frame}{Central loop}
-  Set, wait, read, wait, repeat.
+  At its core, PyCMDS does something very simple...
+  \vspace{\baselineskip} \\ 
+  Set, wait, read, wait, repeat.  % TODO: better figure
   \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
   Everything is multi-threaded (simultaneous motion, simultaneous read).
+  \begin{itemize}
+    \item decrease scan time by up to $\sim2\times$, more for complex experiments
+  \end{itemize}
+\end{frame}
+
+\begin{frame}{Extensibility}
 \end{frame}
   
-\begin{frame}{Acquisitions}
-  Acquisition---a particular set of actions.
-  \vspace{\baselineskip} \\
-  Acquisition modules---a GUI that accepts a user instruction.
+\subsection{Hardware}  % --------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+\begin{frame}{Modular Hardware Model}
+  [DARIEN ADDED AEROTECH IN ONE DAY]
+  [I ADDED NEW OPA IN TWO DAYS]
 \end{frame}
 
+\subsection{Acquisitions}  % ----------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+\begin{frame}{Acquisition Modules}
+  [SUNDEN ADDED POYNTING TUNE IN SEVERAL DAYS]
+\end{frame}
+  
+\subsection{Queue}  % -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
 \begin{frame}{Queue}
-  Queue.
   \adjincludegraphics[width=\textwidth]{acquisition/screenshots/004}
 \end{frame}
 
@@ -199,19 +208,33 @@
   \end{itemize}
 \end{frame}
 
-\subsection{Extensibility}  % ---------------------------------------------------------------------
-
-% DARIEN ADDED AEROTECH STAGE---1 DAY
+\section{Artifacts}  % ============================================================================
 
-% SUNDEN ADDED CUSTOM POYNTING TUNE IN A FEW DAYS (including testing)
+\begin{frame}{Acquisition}
+  \centering \huge
+  Artifact Rejection
+\end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}{Shots Processing}
+  [DIGITAL SHOTS PROCESSING---NO MORE BOXCARS]
+\end{frame}
+ 
 \section{Processing}  % ===========================================================================
 
 \begin{frame}{Processing}
-  WrightTools.
+  \centering \huge
+  Data Processing
 \end{frame}
 
-\begin{frame}{TOC}
+\begin{frame}{Dimensionality}
+  \begin{columns}
+    \begin{column}{0.4\textwidth}
+      \adjincludegraphics[width=\textwidth]{presentation/TOC}
+    \end{column}
+    \begin{column}{0.6\textwidth}
+      TEST
+    \end{column}
+  \end{columns}
 \end{frame}
 
 \begin{frame}{Flexible data model}
@@ -223,8 +246,49 @@
 \section{Conclusion}  % ===========================================================================
 
 \begin{frame}{Conclusion}
+  [CONCLUSION]
 \end{frame}
 
+\begin{frame}{Acknowledgments}
+  \begin{columns}
+    \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
+      Wright Group
+      \begin{itemize}
+        \item Kyle Sunden
+        \item Darien Morrow
+        \item Jonathan Handali
+        \item Nathan Neff-Mallon
+        \item Kyle Czech         
+        \item Dan Kohler
+        \item Erin Boyle
+        \item Paul Hebert
+        \item Skye Kain
+        \item John
+        \item (and more...)
+      \end{itemize}
+    \end{column}
+    \begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
+      Committee
+      \begin{itemize}
+        \item Kyoung-Shin Choi
+        \item Randall Goldsmith
+        \item Tim Bertram
+      \end{itemize}
+      \vspace{\baselineskip}
+      UW-Madison Chemistry Department
+      \begin{itemize}
+        \item Rob McClain
+        \item Pam Doolittle
+        \item Bill Goebel
+        \item Steve Myers
+      \end{itemize}
+      \vspace{\baselineskip}  
+      You, the audience!
+      \hl{Questions?}
+    \end{column}
+  \end{columns}
+\end{frame}
+  
 \section{Supplement}  % ===========================================================================
  
 \begin{frame}{Modular hardware model}
-- 
cgit v1.2.3