\chapter{Acquistion} \label{cha:acq} \begin{dquote} The question of software correctness ultimately boils down to, “Does it do what we have in our minds, even the things we have not gotten around to thinking about yet?” \dsignature{Alistair Cockburn} \end{dquote} \clearpage \section{Introduction} % ========================================================================= MR-CMDS instruments need to be capable of several different things. % At its core, MR-CMDS is about delivering multiple pulses of light to a sample. % The frequency and relative arrival time (delay) of each pulse must be scanned in the context of a basic multidimensional experiment. % Scanning frequency requires using motors to change crystal angles and other optics within Optical Parametric Amplifiers (OPAs). % Scanning delay typically involves moving mirrors very small distances such that the optical path length of certain beam-lines changes. % In addition to these ``first-order'' controls, the power of MR-CMDS is enhanced with additional control of pulse intensity and polarization. % TODO: citations to motivate this 'enhancement' An automated monchromator is typically used to spectrally resolve or isolate output signal. % Each of these features is an optomechanical device: a piece of hardware that must be controlled in the context of an MR-CMDS experiment. % A scan in MR-CMDS typically means going to a whole series of different positions. % As an example, a three-dimensional ``movie'' might be collected in the following way: \begin{codefragment}{python, label=aqn:lst:psuedoaqn} w1_points = [14300, 14400, 14500, 14600, 14700] # wn w2_points = [14100, 14200, 14300, 14400, 14500, 14600, 14700] # wn d2_points = [100, 75, 50, 25, 0, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 175, 200] # fs for w2 in w2_points: set_w2(w2) for w1 in w1_points: set_w1(w1) for d2 in d2_points: set_d2(d2) measure_signal() \end{codefragment} In this simple example, there are 5 \python{w1} destinations, 7 \python{w2} destinations, and 12 \python{d2} destinations, so there are a total of $5\times7\times12=420$ pixels in the three-dimensional scan. % The acquisition software must set the hardware to each of these points and acquire data at each of them. % Each hardware motion and signal measurement takes roughly one second, so this acquisition would take roughly 7 minutes to complete. % In practice, real scans are composed of $\sim$100 to $\sim$100,000 pixels, and take between 1 minute and one day to acquire. % Because of the highly specialized nature of these experiments, MR-CMDS instruments typically require custom software to address all of the simultaneous, repeated motor motion that a scan requires. % Because MR-CMDS is really a family of techniques which require different kinds of motor motion, this acqusition software should be flexable enough to meet the creativity of its users. % Furthermore, because MR-CMDS is a bleeding edge, rapidly evolving technique the instrumental software must be built in an extendable way to accommodate the ever-changing hardware configurations. % In this chapter I describe how I built such an acquisition software, PyCMDS. % PyCMDS is a unified software for controlling hardware and collecting data in the Wright Group. % It is written almost entirely in Python, with a graphical user interface (GUI) made using Qt. [CITE] % It is cross-platform, with a core capable of running on Linux, Windows and macOS. % It is open source, developed on GitHub. [CITE (GITHUB, PyCMDS)] % In the Wright Group, PyCMDS replaces the old acquisition softwares `ps control', written by Kent Meyer, [CITE] and `Control for Lots of Research in Spectroscopy' (COLORS) written by Schuyler Kain [CITE]. % Today PyCMDS is used to drive both of the MR-CMDS instruments maintained by the Wright Group: the ``fs table'', focused on semiconductor photophysics, and the ``ps table'', focused on molecular systems. % % BJT: consider giving more historical context re: COLORS, ps_control PyCMDS is best thought of as a central program with three kinds of modular ``plugins'' that can be extended indefinitely: \begin{ditemize} \item Hardware: things that can be set to a position (\autoref{aqn:sec:hardware}). \item Sensors: things that can be used to measure a signal (\autoref{aqn:sec:sensors}). \item Acquisition modules: things that can be used to define and carry out an acquisition, and associated post-processing (\autoref{aqn:sec:somatic}). \end{ditemize} The first design rule for PyCMDS is that these three things should be easy for the average (motivated) user to add by herself. % Modularity and extensibility is important for all scientific software projects (see \autoref{cha:sof}), but it is of paramount importance for acquisition software simply because the diversity of hardware and experimental configurations is so great. % It is conceivable to imagine 90\% overlap between the data processing and simulation needs of one spectroscopist to the next, but there is almost no overlap between hardware configurations even in the two primary instruments maintained by the Wright Group. % Besides the extendable modular pieces, the rest of PyCMDS is a mostly-static code-base that accepts modules and does the necessary things to handle display of information from, and communication between them. % % TODO: describe each of the sections of this chapter In designing PyCMDS, I was inspired by the nervous system... \begin{dquote} The autonomic nervous system, which innervates primarily the smooth musculature of all organs, the heart and the glands, mediates the neuronal regulation of the internal milieu. % The actions of this system, as its name implies, are in general not under direct voluntary control. % These characteristics distinguish the autonomic nervous system from the somatic nervous system, which mediates afferent and efferent communication with the enviornment and, for the most part, is subject to voluntary control and accessible to consciousness. % The autonomic and somatic systems operate hand in hand... The functions of the autnomic nervous system are to keep the internal milieu of the body constant (homeostasis...) or adjust it as required by changing circumstances (e.g., mechanical work, food intake, water deprivation, heat or cold). % \dsignature{W. J\"{a}nig, Autonomic Nervous System (1989) \cite{JanigW1989a}} \end{dquote} \clearpage \section{Graphical user interface} % ============================================================= When PyCMDS starts up, the GUI is constructed out of modules depending on which hardware and sensors the user has instructed the program to address. % A screenshot of the PyCMDS GUI, running on the fs table, is shown in \autoref{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot}. % On the left hand there is a single column displaying the current positions for all loaded hardware. % Users may enter new destinations and hit the ``SET'' button. % Positions have units, which are changeable through the pull-down menu next to the control and display. % Each hardware knows its own limits, displayed in a tool tip when hovering over the control. % Users cannot type values outside of hardware limits into the controls. % Each hardware also has an ``ADVANCED'' button, which takes the user to a more extensive GUI to control lots more features (see section ....) % At the very top, on the left hand side, is the ``SHUT DOWN'' button. % On the right hand side there is a extensive set of nested tabs. % The top level tabs are ``Program'', ``Hardware'', ``Devices'', ``Autonomic'', ``Somatic'' and ``Plot''. % Under each of these tabs is an entire separate set of display and control elements. % Some of these elements are themselves tabbed, like the ``Somatic'' tab (active in \autoref{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot}), which has ``Queue'' and ``Scan'' sub-tabs. % At the top of the right hand side there is a progress bar and queue status display, which I will discuss further in future sections. % \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"acquisition/screenshots/005"} \caption[PyCMDS at startup.]{ PyCMDS at startup, on the fs system. % } \label{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot} \end{figure} \end{landscape} When PyCMDS opens (\autoref{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot}), the user is first greeted with the ``Somatic/Queue'' tab on the right hand side of the GUI. % This is where the tells PyCMDS to do acquisitions. % In PyCMDS, all acquisitions are done in a queue system. % A queue is just a list of acquisitions, where the acquisitions are carried out one by one in order. % To instruct PyCMDS to do an acquisition, the user must first create a queue by entering in a chosen name (default is ``queue''), and pressing the ``MAKE NEW QUEUE'' button. % Alternatively the user may open an existing queue using ``OPEN QUEUE''. % Next, the user must add the desired acquisition(s) to the queue. % There are several acquisition modules, each with a different purpose. % Choose an acquisition module using the drop down menu. % Enter a name for your acquisition, and any additional info that you might want to keep track of. % Finally, fill out any additional information that acquisition module might require, and press ``APPEND TO QUEUE''. % Once there are acquisitions in the queue, the user can press ``RUN QUEUE''. % \autoref{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot_during_scan} is a screenshot of PyCMDS during a representative acquisition. % This time, thee ``Somatic/Scan'' tab is chosen. % On the left hand side, we can see that the ``SHUT DOWN'' and ``SET'' buttons are grayed out and unclickable, since the somatic system is in control of PyCMDS. % At the moment when this screen shot was taken, PyCMDS is waiting for w3 (OPA-800CG) to finish moving, as the ``BUSY'' indicator shows. % The progress bar, near the top of the GUI, is partially green to indicate the portion of the current scan that is finished. % On the left hand side of the progress bar the time elapsed (fifteen minutes, thirty-seven seconds) is shown, and on the right hand shows the time remaining (three hours, eight minutes, sixteen seconds). % In the center of the progress bar are the current scan parameters. % The ``Somatic/Scan'' tab is built as an active display of currently acquiring data. % A large graph and number show the current signal levels. % On the far right-hand side, the device and channel to display can be chosen via drop-down menu. % Under ``Status'', the loop time and scan index help users gauge the progress of their scan. % In this case, the displayed pixel (index 6, 40) took 2.448 seconds to acquire. % \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=9in]{"acquisition/screenshots/000"} \caption[PyCMDS while scanning.]{ PyCMDS while acquiring data, on the ps system. % } \label{aqn:fig:pycmds_screenshot_during_scan} \end{figure} \end{landscape} % TODO: queue figure \section{Internal structure} % =================================================================== In this section I discuss the internal structure of PyCMDS. % While there are a huge number of details not worthy of discussion (at time of writing, PyCMDS consists of 16,582 lines of source code), PyCMDS is made to be maintained and extended by future graduate students, so some insight into the internal structure is warranted. % \subsection{Multithreading} % -------------------------------------------------------------------- PyCMDS spends the vast majority of its runtime waiting---waiting for user input through mouse clicks or keyboard presses, waiting for hardware to finish moving or for sensors to finish reading and return signals. % Despite all of this downtime, it is crucial that the software respond very quickly when instructions or signals are received. % To achieve this, PyCMDS is designed using \emph{multithreading}. % The main thread handles the graphical user interface (GUI) and other ``top level'' things. % Everything else happens in child threads. % Each hardware instance (e.g. a delay stage) lives in its own thread, as does each sensor. % Since only one scan happens at a time, all acquisition modules share a single thread that handles the orchestration of hardware motion, sensor operation, and data processing that the chosen acquisition requires. % Threads are powerful because they allow for ``semi-synchronous'' operation. % Imagine PyCMDS is in the middle of a 2D delay-delay scan, and the scan thread has just told each of the two delay stages to head to their destinations. % PyCMDS must sit in a tight loop to keep track of the position as closely as possible during motor motion. % In a single-threaded configuration, this tight loop would only run for one delay at a time, such that PyCMDS would have to finish shepherding one delay stage before turning its attention to the second. % In a multi-threaded configuration, each thread will run simultaniously, switching off CPU cycles at a low level far faster than human comprehension. % This switching is handled in an OS and hardware specific way---luckily it is all abstracted through platform-agnostic Qt threads. % Threads are dangerous because it is hard to pass information between them. % Without any special protection, two threads have no reason not to simultaneously edit and read the same location in memory. % If a delay stage is writing its position to memory as a 64-bit double at the same time as the acquisition thread reads that memory address, the acquisition thread will read in nonsense (or worse, PyCMDS will crash). % So some strategy is needed to ensure that threads respect each other. % The Mutex design allows threads to ``lock'' an object such that it cannot be modified by a different thread. % This lock is like the ``talking stick'' employed my many early child educators. % When the talking stick is being used, only the child that holds the stick is allowed to speak. % The stick must be passed to another child (as directed by the teacher) before they can share their thought. % PyCMDS makes heavy use of Mutexes, in particular the \bash{QMutex} class \cite{QMutex}. % Mutexes handle basic information transfer (two threads can both safely modify and read a particular object), but what about sending instructions between threads? % Here the problem is deciding what happens when multiple instructions are given simultaneously, or an instruction is given while another instruction is being carried out. % Again, this is a classic problem in computer science, and the classic answer is the queue. % Queues are just like lines at the coffee shop---each person (instruction) is served (carried out) in the order that they joined the line. % Queues are commonly referred to as FIFO (First In First Out) for this reason. % PyCMDS uses queues for almost all instructions. % Finally, PyCMDS makes extensive use of the ``signals and slots'' construct, which is somewhat unique (and certainly original) to Qt. % Signals and slots are powerful because they allow threads without instruction to go completely silent, making them essentially free in terms of CPU usage. % Normally, a thread needs to sit in a loop merely listening for instructions. % Within the Qt framework, a thread can be ``woken'' by a signal without needing that thread to explicitly ``listen''. % These concepts fit within the broader umbrella of ``event-driven programming'', a concept that has been used in many languages and frameworks (notably high level LabVIEW tends to be very event-driven). % The Qt signals and slots system massively simplifies programming within PyCMDS. % Note that multithreading is very different from multiprocessing. % \subsection{Abstraction and inheritance} % ------------------------------------------------------- Towards the goal of stability and extensability, PyCMDS makes heavy use of abstraction and inheritance. % Abstraction means that complex implementation details are hidden by simple interfaces. % For example, consider the simple case of setting an OPA to a particular color. % For OPAs in the Wright Group, this operation requires the following: \begin{ditemize} \item Load the OPA tuning curve, find which motors must move. \item Interpolate the discrete tuning curve, and evaluate that interpolated curve at the desired destination. \item Send each motor towards their new destination. \item Wait for the motors to arrive, check that nothing has gone wrong. \end{ditemize} This is not even to mention the complexity of spawning and sending information between the main thread and working threads. % Through abstraction, PyCMDS is able to wrap all this complexity into the \python{OPA} class and it's \python{set_position} method---so doing all of the operations above is as simple as \python{opa.set_position(1300, 'nm')}. % Importantly, abstraction does not magically get rid of the complexity. % It simply \emph{hides} the complexity so that it becomes tractable to write simple interfaces to accomplish complex things. % PyCMDS implements abstraction through inheritance. % In object oriented programming, inheritance is when one class is based on another. % The \emph{child} class acquires all of the properties of the \emph{parent} class. % The child class, then, can modify or extend the properties that it needs, without needing to re-implement the properties that it shares with the parent. % Let's consider PyCMDS hardware again. % Every single unique hardware in PyCMDS lives in it's own worker thread, so the basic problem of information transfer through queues and Mutexes is shared between them. % A \python{Hardware} class which is parent to \emph{all} hardwares can define the methods and attributes necessary to abstract this basic thread communication issue. % Every type of delay stage addressed by PyCMDS needs to handle the basic task of translating between ``natural'' units (femtosecond, picosecond, nanosecond) and ``native'' units (typically mm). % They all need an attribute \python{zero_position}, in native units, and a method to do the conversion. % A class common to all delay stages can abstract away all of these conversion details. % In summary, an inheritance-based system for implementing delay stages might look like this: \begin{codefragment}{bash} Hardware # implements basic thread control └── Delay # implements conversion between natural and native units ├── Homemade ├── Thorlabs └── Newport \end{codefragment} The powerful thing about this strategy is that the three driver-specific classes (\python{Homemade}, \python{Thorlabs}, and \python{Newport}) need only implement minimal driver-specific code, typically \python{start}, \python{set} and \python{close}. % This means that code is more maintainable and less repeated. % For example, when I added the autonomic system to PyCMDS, I edited the parent \python{Delay} class to respect a new method \python{set_offset}. % I did \python{not} need to modify any of the child classes, because nothing about communicating with the particular delay stages, in native units, had changed. % This allowed me to implement the core of the autonomic system in just one weekend, something that probably would have taken weeks to do without inheritance. % \subsection{Core classes of PyCMDS} % ------------------------------------------------------------ Now we can see that PyCMDS is going to use multi-threading, inheritance and abstraction as much as possible, so let's get into some details about the \emph{actual} internal structure of the software. % For those that want to dig deeper, most of these top level classes are defined in \bash{PyCMDS/project/classes.py}. % \subsubsection{Data types} % --------------------------------------------------------------------- PyCMDS is made to be enhanced and extended by chemistry graduate students who may not have time or energy to learn about Mutexes, signals, slots and threads. % They probably also don't have time to read Qt documentation and learn the details of GUI design and layout. % PyCMDS does its very best to abstract these details away from developers by offering a set of basic \emph{data type} classes which work seamlessly with every part of the program. % These are simple classes, each meant to represent one kind of data: \begin{ditemize} \item Bool \item Combo \item Filepath \item Number \item String \end{ditemize} All are children of the parent \python{PyCMDS_object} class, which defines much of their shared functionality. % By using these classes to store and pass around bits of information within PyCMDS, users get the following advantages: \begin{ditemize} \item Thread safety. These classes \emph{are} Mutexes. \item Optional integration with the GUI (see section ...) \item Optional storage of state within INI files, including through restart. % \item Special conveniences, like limits, units, and labels. \end{ditemize} In short, developers should use these classes whenever possible for a worry-free development experience. % The only downside is that the value has to be accessed with \python{read} and \python{write} methods, rather than directly. % This is typical behavior for Mutexes, however. % \subsubsection{Hardware and driver} % ------------------------------------------------------------ Now that we have basic data types to work with, let's actually communicate with hardware. % Every hardware and sensor have two classes: a driver class, which lives in the worker thread and handles direct communication, and a hardware class which lives in the main thread and ``represents'' that device to the rest of PyCMDS. % The idea is that all of PyCMDS communicates to that device \emph{only} via its hardware class, and that hardware class only talks to that driver class. % Designing it in this simple way keeps everything clean and easy to understand. % All hardware and driver classes are children of the same parent \python{Hardware} and \python{Driver} classes. % These parent classes know how to communicate in a thread safe way, and they know the specific attributes (like \python{name}), and signals (like \python{update_ui}) that all hardware and sensors must have. % \autoref{aqn:fig:parent_hardware_class} shows the parent hardware class, and \autoref{aqn:fig:parent_driver_class} shows the parent driver class. % Communication between the hardware and the driver goes via a queue, as mentioned previously. % The hardware class has an attribute \python{q}, which is an instance of the \python{Q} class. % To enqueue an operation, use \python{q.push(, )} where \python{} is a string corresponding to the name of the method you wish to run in the worker thread, and \python{} is a list of arguments passed to that method. % The \python{q} instance will hold the instruction until the \python{Driver} instance is ready, at which point \python{Driver.dequeue} will be called in the worker thread. % There is no way for the driver to command hardware to do something in the main thread, but the driver can trigger signals like \python{update_ui} and modify Mutexes. % [PARENTS ARE VIRTUAL HARDWARE] \begin{figure} \includepython{"acquisition/parent_hardware.py"} \caption[Parent to hardware and sensors.]{ Parent class of all hardware and sensors. % For brevity, methods \python{close}, \python{update} and \python{wait_until_still} have been omitted. % } \label{aqn:fig:parent_hardware_class} \end{figure} \begin{figure} \includepython{"acquisition/driver.py"} \caption[TODO]{ Parent class of all drivers. % } \label{aqn:fig:parent_driver_class} \end{figure} \subsubsection{GUI components} % ----------------------------------------------------------------- The PyCMDS GUI must change depending on which exact hardware, sensors, and acquisition modules are being used on a given instrument and given day. % Internally, the GUI components are made to be modular and flexable to accommodate this requirement. % Rather than having each piece placed ``by hand'', the PyCMDS GUI is defined programmatically and, as such, the full power of abstraction and inheritance is available to the GUI-defining code. % To keep things simple and easy to extend, PyCMDS is made up of only a few minimalist GUI elements. % Probably the most important graphical element is the fixed-width vertical scroll area. % As seen in [PYCMDS SCREENSHOTS], these vertical scroll areas contain almost all of the interactive elements within PyCMDS, with the only exceptions being the ``SHUT DOWN'' button and the interactive graphs. % The left-hand scroll area is always present, and it contains the principle display and control for each hardware. % There are also scroll areas inside the tabbed menus, typically only one per tab. % Because the scroll areas can expand downwards infinitely, they are great at accommodating the changing contents of the PyCMDS GUI. % Ignoring small decorative items, vertical scroll areas contain only two kinds of widgets: instances of \python{Button} and \python{InputTable}. % Buttons are fairly self-explanatory. % Internally they work through signals and slots (the \python{clicked} signal), and they can have different behaviors including changing their label and color when clicked and being disabled or enabled. % Input tables are the two column GUI elements that are everywhere in PyCMDS. % The great thing about input tables is that they accept PyCMDS ``data type'' objects directly. % Given an instance of \python{Number} called \python{destination}, adding to the input table is as easy as \python{input_table.add('Destination', destination)}. % Internally, PyCMDS will do all of the work to make sure that \python{destination} is displayed in the GUI. % The \python{destination.updated} signal will fire whenever a user manually interacts with the display. % Attributes \python{display} and \python{disabled} change the behavior of the GUI element. % Vertical scroll areas contain the input tables, and (on the right hand side), tabs contain the vertical scroll areas. % Like the input tables, this tabbed structure is designed to be extended as needed. % For example, in the autonomic system, there needs to be a tab for each and every hardware currently loaded by PyCMDS. % To accommodate this, the somatic system simply builds a tab for each hardware at PyCMDS startup. % In addition to the parent \python{Hardware} and \python{Driver} classes mentioned in the previous section, each hardware type has a \python{GUI} class, itself a child of the parent \python{GUI} class. % The \python{GUI} class defines the ``ADVANCED'' interface that is unique to each hardware (see HARDWARE SECTION). % Like everywhere else, inheritance and abstraction are used to minimize unnecessary replication of code. % To a first approximation, every delay stage needs the same ``ADVANCED'' settings as every other delay stage. % PyCMDS uses pyqtgraph \cite{pyqtgraph} for interactive plotting. % pyqtgraph is great because it is optimized for speed and interactivity. % Currently only line plots are supported (through the \python{PyCMDS.project.widgets.Plot1D} class), but 2D plots are supported by pyqtgraph and could be added in future versions. % For those wanting to learn more, all graphical components are defined in \bash{PyCMDS/project/widgets.py}. % \clearpage \section{Hardware} \label{aqn:sec:hardware} % ==================================================== Hardware are things that 1) have a position, 2) can be set to a destination. % Typically they also have associated units and limits. % They sometimes have an offset, as specified by the autonomic system (\autoref{aqn:sec:autonomic}). % Each hardware can be thought of as a dimension of the MR-CMDS experiment, and scans include a specific traversal through this multidimensional space. % In this section I briefly discuss PyCMDS' implementation for each type of hardware. % \subsection{Hardware inheritance} % -------------------------------------------------------------- All hardware classes are children of the parent \python{Hardware} class (\autoref{aqn:fig:hardware_class}), which is itself a child of the the global \python{Hardware} class shown in \autoref{aqn:fig:parent_hardware_class}. % By inspecting \autoref{aqn:fig:hardware_class}, we can see that all hardware require the following methods: \begin{ditemize} \item \python{close} \item \python{get_destination} \item \python{get_position} \item \python{on_address_initialized} \item \python{poll} \item \python{set_offset} \item \python{set_position} \item \python{@property units} \end{ditemize} \autoref{aqn:fig:hardware_inheritance} shows the full inheritance tree, including all nine types of hardware currently supported by PyCMDS. % In general the nesting is type/model, although there can be additional levels of nesting when required, as can be seen in the case of OPA/TOPAS/TOPAS-C and OPA/TOPAS/TOPAS-800. % \begin{figure} \includepython{"acquisition/hardware.py"} \caption[Parent hardware class.]{ Parent class of all hardware. % For brevity, methods \python{close}, \python{get_destination}, \python{get_position}, \python{is_valid}, \python{on_address_initialized}, \python{poll}, and \python{@property units} have been omitted. % } \label{aqn:fig:hardware_class} \end{figure} \begin{figure} \includebash{"acquisition/hardware_inheritance"} \caption[Hardware inheritance.]{ CAPTION TODO } \label{aqn:fig:hardware_inheritance} \end{figure} \subsection{Delays} % ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Delays are the kind of thing that have a position in absolute units, a zero position, and a relative position measured in fs or ps. % They also are the kind of thing that is most commonly subject to offset by the Autonomic system... % In addition to the inherited methods, delay hardware objects require the following: \begin{ditemize} \item \python{set_motor_position} \end{ditemize} Delay driver objects require the following: \begin{ditemize} \item \python{set_motor_position} \end{ditemize} The delay GUI, by default, offers \begin{ditemize} \item \python{on_home} \item \python{on_set_motor} \item \python{on_set_zero} \end{ditemize} \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=9in]{"acquisition/screenshots/006"} \caption[Representative delay stage advanced menu.]{ CAPTION TODO } \label{aqn:fig:delay_advanced} \end{figure} \end{landscape} \subsection{Spectrometers} % --------------------------------------------------------------------- Spectrometers are the kind of thing that can be set to a single color (typically native units are in nm). % They often have turrets that allow for switching between gratings. % Other features are not currently supported as PyCMDS has only been asked to drive one kind of monochromator so far. % Hardware: Driver: GUI: \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=9in]{"acquisition/screenshots/007"} \caption[Representative spectrometer advanced menu.]{ CAPTION TODO } \label{aqn:fig:spectrometer_advanced} \end{figure} \end{landscape} \subsection{OPAs} % ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hardware: Driver: GUI: \subsubsection{Curves} Recursive United Interpolation \begin{landscape} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[width=9in]{"acquisition/screenshots/008"} \caption[Representative OPA advanced menu.]{ CAPTION TODO } \label{aqn:fig:opa_advanced} \end{figure} \end{landscape} \subsection{Filters} % --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware: Driver: GUI: \clearpage \section{Sensors (devices)} \label{aqn:sec:sensors} % ============================================ Sensors are... For DAQ cards, shots and samples... Power of digital processing... Old boxcar: 300 ns window, ~10 micosecond delay. Onset of saturation ~2 V. % TODO: screenshots \subsection{Sensors as axes} % ------------------------------------------------------------------- % TODO: equation from Skye % TODO: poweramp tune test (see darien slack) \begin{figure} \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"acquisition/tune_test"} \caption[Array detector serving as an axis.]{ CAPTION TODO (2017-11-06 OPA2) } \label{aqn:fig:array_as_axis} \end{figure} \section{Autonomic} \label{aqn:sec:autonomic} % ================================================== The autonomic system is used to define ``reflexes'' for PyCMDS---operations that are automatically applied when certain conditions are met. % Currently the autonomic system has only functionality: \emph{offset} certain hardware as functional of other hardware's positions. % The classic example of autonomic offsets comes from spectral delay correction (see section [ACT]). % Spectral delay refers to the small delay changes that occur when OPAs change output frequency. % To correct for spectral delay, the appropriate delay stages can simply be \emph{offset}. % In PyCMDS, the autonomic system is fully general---that is to say, any hardware can be offset according to any other hardware. % This means that spectral delay correction is possible for arbitrarily complex laser setups, and it means that PyCMDS is prepared for corrections that have not yet been fully implemented, such as automated power correction. % Simple plain-text \bash{.coset} files define the offset arrays. % They are automatically generated using processing scripts in \python{attune} [CITE]. % Their headers prevent them from being loaded in the wrong spot. % These files are internally represented as instances of the \python{CoSet} class, which is capable of linear interpolation and extrapolation at the edges. % A single hardware can be offset by multiple other hardwares. % In such cases, \emph{offsets always add}. % \begin{figure} \caption{AUTONOMIC SDC SCREENSHOT} \end{figure} \clearpage \section{Somatic} \label{aqn:sec:somatic} % ======================================================= In contrast with the autonomic system (\autoref{aqn:sec:autonomic}), the somatic system is all about voluntary, user specified motion. % This is where the fun stuff happens---the acquisitions! PyCMDS uses the words ``scan'' and ``acquisition'' in very careful ways. % \begin{ditemize} \item An acquisition is a single user-defined, enqueable, instruction. \item A scan is a single traversal in the multidimensional hardware space. % \end{ditemize} Each scan corresponds to one \bash{.data} file, and one WrightTools \python{Data} instance (see section ...) % There can be many scans within a single acquisition. % And there can be many acquisitions in a queue. % PyCMDS saves the data that it is collecting within a nested folder structure queue/acquisition/scan. % A \bash{.queue} file holds everything needed to recreate the queue, \python{.aqn} files define each acquisition in plain text and \python{.data} files hold the multidimensional data itself. % In this section I describe each component of the somatic system in greater detail. % \subsection{Queue manager} % --------------------------------------------------------------------- The queue manager keeps track of all enqueued acquisitions, and tells each acquisition when to begin. % A singleton \python{Queue} class lives in the main thread and handles interfacing to the \bash{.queue} plain-text file. % When a user appends new acquisitions, or changes their order, the \python{queue} instance makes sure that those changes are reflected in the GUI and the file. % A special singleton \python{QueueStatus} keeps track of, well, the queue status: a series of booleans \python{go}, \python{going}, \python{pause}, \python{paused}, \python{stop}, and \python{stopped}. % The verb booleans (\python{go}, \python{pause}, \python{paused}), are control flags, to be written by the main thread. % The present particple booleans (\python{going}, \python{paused}, \python{stopped}) are flags to be written by the worker thread to indicate status of the current acquisition. % A singleton \python{Worker} class lives in the acquisition worker thread and carries out the actual operation. % The \python{queue} instance pushes operations to the \python{worker}, and the \python{worker} sends a signal that causes \python{queue.on_action_complete} to be called. % If there are more enqueued acquisitions, and \python{queue_status.go} is true, the \python{queue} instance pushes the next operation to the \python{worker} and the process starts over again. % The queue manager is capable of more than just acquisitions. % For example, users can enqueue a wait operation that simply pauses PyCMDS for a certain amount of time or until some condition is met. % Those who wish to learn more can refer to \bash{PyCMDS/somatic/queue.py}. % \subsection{Scans} % ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Every single scan within PyCMDS is handled by one method of one class, \python{Worker.scan} from the file \bash{PyCMDS/somatic/acquisition.py}. % This method understands how to any scan that PyCMDS can do: any stepwise multidimensional scan with separate hardware and sensors. % The central scan method requires acquisition modules to provide all of the axes (instances of \python{PyCMDS.somatic.acquisition.Axis}) that need to be broadcast across each-other. % Then something very simple happens. % For each hardware that will move during the scan, a destinations object (instance of \python{PyCMDS.somatic.acquisition.Destinations}) is created. % This object has the same shape as the full multidimensional scan, and contains the destination for that hardware for that pixel in the scan. % Then, a \bash{.data} file is created to accept the data that is about to be collected. % A bunch of signals go off, telling PyCMDS that it needs to yield to somatic control. % Then PyCMDS simply sits in a loop generated by \python{numpy.ndindex} [CITE] and visits each pixel in turn. % \python{ndindex} is a n-dimensional iterator over a given array shape. % Written simply, it does the following: \begin{codefragment}{python} def ndindex(shape): rs = [range(s) for s in shape] pools = map(tuple, rs) result = [[]] for pool in pools: result = [x+[y] for x in result for y in pool] for prod in result: yield tuple(prod) \end{codefragment} So that when evaluated: \begin{codefragment}{python} >>> for idx in ndindex((4, 3, 2)): print idx (0, 0, 0) (0, 0, 1) (0, 1, 0) (0, 1, 1) (0, 2, 0) (0, 2, 1) (1, 0, 0) ... (3, 2, 0) (3, 2, 1) \end{codefragment} This simple algorithm is used to visit each pixel in the entire PyCMDS scan space. % At each pixel, something much like the following happens. % \begin{codefragment}{python, label=aqn:lst:loop_simple} for idx in ndindex(shape): for hardware in hardwares:: hardware.set(idx) for hardware in hardwares: hardware.wait_until_still() for sensor in sensors: sensor.read() for sensor in sensors: sensor.wait_until_done() \end{codefragment} The pattern is simple: launch hardware, wait for still, launch sensors, wait for done. % The simplicity of this central loop truly shows the power of abstraction in PyCMDS. % \subsection{Acquisition modules} % --------------------------------------------------------------- Acquisition modules are defined interfaces which know how to assemble a scan. % \autoref{aqn:fig:aqn_file} shows an aqn file for an acquisition using SCAN. % \begin{figure} \includebash{"acquisition/example.aqn"} \caption[Example aqn file.]{ CAPTION TODO } \label{aqn:fig:aqn_file} \end{figure} \subsubsection{SCAN} SCAN is by far the most important acquisition module in PyCMDS---it handles acquisitions for almost all of the CMDS experiments that PyCMDS has ever accomplished. % SCAN is capable of acquisitions of arbitrary dimensionality. % Users simply append as many axes as they want. % Acquistions are done with the trailing (highest index) axis as the innermost loop. % Arbitrary expressions (PyCMDS calls them ``constants'') are also possible, as can be seen in \autoref{aqn:fig:aqn_file}. % \subsubsection{TUNE TEST} The TUNE TEST module does a simple thing: it sets a chosen OPA to each of the points in it's tuning curve and does a monochromator scan of set width about that setpoint. % In this way the tune (output color) agreement between the curve and the OPA can be determined. % As a convinience, a new point curve with remapped colors is automatically created. % % TODO: link to place in tuning chapter... \subsubsection{MOTORTUNE} Arbitrary tuning acquisitions. \subsubsection{AUTOTUNE} Automatically do appropriate scans and process as in chapter... \subsubsection{POYNTING TUNE} Dedicated to poynting (get content from Kyle S)... \clearpage \section{Conditional validity} % ================================================================= The central conceit of the PyCMDS modular hardware abstraction is that experiments can be boiled down to a set of orthogonal axes that can be set separately from other hardware and sensor status. % This requirement is loosened by the autonomic and expression systems, such that any experiment could \emph{probably} be forced into PyCMDS, but still the conceit stands---PyCMDS is probably \emph{not} the correct framework if your experiment cannot be reduced in this way. % From this we can see that it is useful to talk about the conditional validity of the modular hardware abstraction. % The important axis is hardware complexity vs measurement complexity. For hardware-complex problems, the challenge is coordination. % MR-CMDS is the perfect example of a hardware-complex problem. % MR-CMDS is composed of a collection (typically 5 to 10 members) of relatively simple hardware components. % The challenge is that experiments involve complex ``dances'', including expressions, of the component hardwares. % For measurement-complex problems, the challenge is, well, the measurement. % These are experiments where every little piece of the instrument is tied together into a complex network of inseparable parts. % These are often time-domain or ``single shot'' measurements. % Consider work of (GRAPES INVENTOR). % Such instruments are typically much faster at data acquisition and more reliable. % This comes at a price of flexibility: often such instruments cannot be modified or enhanced without touching everything. % From an acquisition software perspective, measurement-complex problems are not amenable to general purpose modular software design. % The instrument is so custom that it certainly requires entirely custom software. % Measurements can be neither hardware-complex nor software-complex (simple) or both (expensive). % Conceptually, can imagine a 4 quadrant system. % Thus PyCMDS can be proud to try and generalize the hardware-complex part of acquisition software because indeed that is all that can be generalized. % \begin{figure} \caption{ CAPTION TODO: 4 QUADRANTS OF COMPLEXITY } \label{aqn:fig:complexity_quandrants} \end{figure} \section{Integrations} % ========================================================================= [GOOGLE DRIVE] [SLACK] \begin{figure} \frame{\includegraphics[width=\textwidth]{"acquisition/slack"}} \caption[TODO]{ TODO } \label{aqn:fig:slack} \end{figure} \section{Future directions} % ==================================================================== \subsection{Spectral delay correction module} % -------------------------------------------------- Currently spectral delay correction is done ``manually''. % Relevant Wigner scans are taken using the SCAN module, processed using WrightTools, and generated coset files are manually applied in the autonomic menu. % Ideally, ``check'' Wigners are then taken to verify the veracity of the corrections. % In the future, it would be preferable to have a dedicated SDC module that did all of these things automatically. % It would start from existing corrections (for that table geometry) and iterate until the applied Wigners are all correct. % \subsection{``Headless'' hardware, sensors} % ---------------------------------------------------- The abstraction of hardware complexity that PyCMDS offers is really convienient, but currently these convinient classes can only be used within PyCMDS itself. % Since code in PyCMDS is inseperable from the GUI, it is not possible to \python{import PyCMDS} and use the abstract tools in other programs or scripts. % This design is not necessary, and doing the work to free hardware and sensor code from the GUI code would allow for all kinds of creative experiments that are not currently possible within the central conceit of PyCMDS. % \subsection{Ideal Axis Positions} \label{acq:sec:ideal_axis_positions} % ------------------------- Frequency domain multidimensional spectroscopy is a time-intensive process. % A typical pixel takes between one-half second and three seconds to acquire. % Depending on the exact hardware being scanned and signal being detected, this time may be mostly due to hardware motion or signal collection. % Due to the curse of dimensionality, a typical three-dimensional CMDS experiment contains roughly 100,000 pixels. % CMDS hardware is transiently-reliable, so speeding up experiments is a crucial component of unlocking ever larger dimensionalities and higher resolutions. % One obvious way to decrease the scan-time is to take fewer pixels. % Traditionally, multidimensional scans are done with linearly arranged points in each axis---this is the simplest configuration to program into the acquisition software. % Because signal features are often sparse or slowly varying (especially so in high-dimensional scans) linear stepping means that \emph{most of the collected pixels} are duplicates or simply noise. % A more intelligent choice of axis points can capture the same nonlinear spectrum in a fraction of the total pixel count. % An ideal distribution of pixels is linearized in \emph{signal}, not coordinate. % This means that every signal level (think of a contour in the N-dimensional case) has roughly the same number of pixels defining it. % If some generic multidimensional signal goes between 0 and 1, one would want roughly 10\% of the pixels to be between 0.9 and 1.0, 10\% between 0.8 and 0.9 and so on. % If the signal is sparse in the space explored (imagine a narrow two-dimensional Lorentzian in the center of a large 2D-Frequency scan) this would place the majority of the pixels near the narrow peak feature(s), with only a few of them defining the large (in axis space) low-signal floor. % In contrast linear stepping would allocate the vast majority of the pixels in the low-signal 0.0 to 0.1 region, with only a few being used to capture the narrow peak feature. % Of course, linearizing pixels in signal requires prior expectations about the shape of the multidimensional signal---linear stepping is still an appropriate choice for low-resolution ``survey'' scans. % CMDS scans often posses correlated features in the multidimensional space. % In order to capture such features as cheaply as possible, one would want to define regions of increased pixel density along the correlated (diagonal) lineshape. % As a concession to reasonable simplicity, our acquisition software (PyCMDS) assumes that all scans constitute a regular array with-respect-to the scanned axes. % We can acquire arbitrary points along each axis, but not for the multidimensional scan. % This means that we cannot achieve strictly ideal pixel distributions for arbitrary datasets. % Still, we can do much better than linear spacing. % TODO: refer to PyCMDS/WrightTools 'regularity' requirement when that section exists Almost all CMDS lineshapes (in frequency and delay) can be described using just a few lineshape functions: \begin{ditemize} \item exponential \item Gaussian \item Lorentzian \item bimolecular \end{ditemize} Exponential and bimolecular dynamics fall out of simple first and second-order kinetics (I will ignore higher-order kinetics here). % Gaussians come from our Gaussian pulse envelopes or from normally-distributed inhomogeneous broadening. % The measured line-shapes are actually convolutions of the above. % I will ignore the convolution except for a few illustrative special cases. % More exotic lineshapes are possible in CMDS---quantum beating and breathing modes, for example---I will also ignore these. % Derivations of the ideal pixel positions for each of these lineshapes appear below. % TODO: cite Wright Group quantum beating paper, Kambempati breathing paper \subsubsection{Exponential} Simple exponential decays are typically used to describe population and coherence-level dynamics in CMDS. % For some generic exponential signal $S$ with time constant $\tau$, \begin{equation} \label{eq:simple_exponential_decay} S(t) = \me^{-\frac{t}{\tau}}. \end{equation} We can write the conjugate equation to \ref{eq:simple_exponential_decay}, asking ``what $t$ do I need to get a cerain signal level?'': \begin{eqnarray} \log{(S)} &=& -\frac{t}{\tau} \\ t &=& -\tau\log{(S)}. \end{eqnarray} So to step linearly in $t$, my step size has to go as $-\tau\log{(S)}$. We want to go linearly in signal, meaning that we want to divide $S$ into even sections. % If $S$ goes from 0 to 1 and we choose to acquire $N$ points, \begin{eqnarray} t_n &=& -\tau\log{\left(\frac{n}{N}\right)}. \end{eqnarray} Note that $t_n$ starts at long times and approaches zero delay. % So the first $t_1$ is the smallest signal and $t_N$ is the largest. % Now we can start to consider realistic cases, like where $\tau$ is not quite known and where some other longer dynamics persist (manifested as a static offset). % Since these values are not separable in a general system, I'll keep $S$ normalized between 0 and 1. % \begin{eqnarray} S &=& (1-c)\me^{-\frac{t}{\tau_{\mathrm{actual}}}} + c \\ S_n &=& (1-c)\me^{-\frac{-\tau_{\mathrm{step}}\log{\left(\frac{n}{N}\right)}}{\tau_{\mathrm{actual}}}} + c \\ S_n &=& (1-c)\me^{-\frac{\tau_{\mathrm{step}}}{\tau_{\mathrm{actual}}} \log{\left(\frac{N}{n}\right)}} + c \\ S_n &=& (1-c)\left(\frac{N}{n}\right)^{-\frac{\tau_{\mathrm{step}}}{\tau_{\mathrm{actual}}}} + c \\ S_n &=& (1-c)\left(\frac{n}{N}\right)^{\frac{\tau_{\mathrm{step}}}{\tau_{\mathrm{actual}}}} + c \end{eqnarray} \begin{figure} \includegraphics[scale=0.5]{"processing/PyCMDS/ideal axis positions/exponential"} \caption[TODO]{TODO} \label{aqn:fig:exponential_steps} \end{figure} \subsubsection{Gaussian} \subsubsection{Lorentzian} \subsubsection{Bimolecular} \subsection{Simultanious acquisitions} % --------------------------------------------------------- Sometimes PyCMDS needs to do multiple scans that are completely orthogonal. % For example, certain OPA tuning operations only require signals from pyroelectric detectors that are each permanently installed to monitor a single OPA. % In such cases, theoretically multiple OPAs could be tuned simultaneously. % The coordination of such operations would be more difficult than what currently exists, but could be possible within PyCMDS' multithreaded design. % \subsection{Hotswappable hardware} % ------------------------------------------------------------- One of the most important basic capabilities of PyCMDS is the ability to reconfigure itself depending on what hardware is loaded. % However controlling the hardware configuration is currently more difficult than it should be. % Currently users need to shut down PyCMDS, manually edit INI files to configure which hardware are included, and restart PyCMDS. % A better solution would allow users to ``hotswap''---load, or drop hardware and sensors without shutting down PyCMDS. % The work of allowing this would also allow users to reload hardware, a great fallback option when there are communication issues. % \subsection{wt5 savefile} % ---------------------------------------------------------------------- The wt5 save format, introduced in WrightTools 3, is a huge improvement over the simple, plaintext data format currently used by PyCMDS. % TODO: link to discussion of wt5 format wt5 files are smaller on disk, have richer metadata and self-descriptive properties, and multiple scans can be stored in the same file using \python{Collections}. % TODO: again, link Because wt5 files are stored on disk but fully accessible through slicing, PyCMDS could have full access to the scan arrays without risk of memory overflow, which promises to allow for new potential visualizations during acquisition. % TODO: presumably we talk about buffered file % writing above? Even more exciting, wt5 files can be instantiated as empty and \textit{then} filled. % This means that the wt5 file can be a self-describing set of destinations that actually defines which pixels PyCMDS should visit. %